Legislature(2007 - 2008)
2007-05-11 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2007-05-11 House Journal Page 1268 HB 177 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 177 "An Act relating to the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act; establishing the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act matching contribution fund; providing for an Alaska Gasline Inducement Act coordinator; making conforming amendments; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page O&G RPT CS(O&G) NT 3DP 2NR 2AM 690 FN1: ZERO(ADM) 691 FN2: ZERO(CED) 691 FN3: ZERO(DNR) 691 FN4: (DNR) 691 FN5: (REV) 691 RES RPT CS(RES) NT 8DP 903, 923 FN1: ZERO(ADM) 903 FN2: ZERO(CED) 903 FN3: ZERO(DNR) 903 FN4: (DNR) 903 FN5: (REV) 903 FN6: (GOV) 903 FN7: (LWF) 903 CORRECTED CS(RES) NT RECEIVED 1000 FIN RPT CS(FIN) NT 7DP 1NR 3AM 1259 2007-05-11 House Journal Page 1269 FN1: ZERO(ADM) 1260 FN2: ZERO(CED) 1260 FN3: ZERO(DNR) 1260 FN5: (REV) 1260 FN6: (GOV) 1260 FN7: (LWF) 1260 FN8: (DNR) 1260 Representative Samuels moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 177(FIN) "An Act relating to the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act; providing inducements for the construction of a natural gas pipeline and shippers that commit to use that pipeline; establishing the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act reimbursement fund; providing for an Alaska Gasline Inducement Act coordinator; making conforming amendments; and providing for an effective date." There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representatives Meyer, Ramras, and Chenault moved and asked unanimous consent that they be allowed to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and the members were required to vote. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representatives Thomas, LeDoux, Edgmon, Wilson, Kerttula, Lynn, and Guttenberg: Page 28, line 13: Insert a new section to read: "Sec. . Outstanding monetary judgments. A license may not be issued under this chapter to an applicant that is subject to an outstanding unpaid monetary judgment stemming from a claim based in Alaska greater than $100 million." Representative Thomas moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. 2007-05-11 House Journal Page 1270 Representative Doogan objected. Representative Thomas moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw Amendment No. 1. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representatives Doogan, Harris, Dahlstrom, Lynn, Roses, Kawasaki, Joule, Seaton, Gardner, Gatto, Crawford, Guttenberg, Gara, Doll, Salmon, Kerttula, Gruenberg, Buch, Nelson, LeDoux, Edgmon, Holmes, and Cissna: Page 9, lines 27 - 29: Delete all material and insert: "(17) commit to negotiate, before construction, a project labor agreement to the maximum extent permitted by law; in this paragraph, "project labor agreement" means a comprehensive collective bargaining agreement between the licensee or its agent and the appropriate labor representatives to ensure expedited construction with labor stability for the project by qualified residents of the state;" Representative Doogan moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Kelly objected. **Representative Foster, who was excused (page 84), left the Chamber. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 177(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 25 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 2007-05-11 House Journal Page 1271 Yeas: Buch, Cissna, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Doll, Doogan, Edgmon, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holmes, Joule, Kawasaki, Kerttula, LeDoux, Lynn, Nelson, Roses, Salmon, Seaton, Stoltze Nays: Chenault, Coghill, Fairclough, Johansen, Johnson, Kelly, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Samuels, Thomas, Wilson Excused: Foster Absent: Kohring And so, Amendment No. 2 was adopted. Representative Samuels moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 177(FIN) am be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 177(FIN) am was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 177(FIN) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 177(FIN) am Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 37 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Buch, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Doll, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Kelly, Kerttula, LeDoux, Lynn, Meyer, Nelson, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Roses, Salmon, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Wilson Nays: Samuels Excused: Foster Absent: Kohring And so, CSHB 177(FIN) am passed the House. 2007-05-11 House Journal Page 1272 Representative Samuels moved the effective date clause. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 177(FIN) am Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 38 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Buch, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Doll, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Kelly, Kerttula, LeDoux, Lynn, Meyer, Nelson, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Roses, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Wilson Excused: Foster Absent: Kohring And so, the effective date clause was adopted. Representative Dahlstrom gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on CSHB 177(FIN) am. HB 177 Representative Dahlstrom moved and asked unanimous consent that reconsideration of CSHB 177(FIN) am be taken up on the same day. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 177(FIN) am was again before the House in third reading. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CSHB 177(FIN) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2007-05-11 House Journal Page 1273 CSHB 177(FIN) am--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 37 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Buch, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Doll, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Kelly, Kerttula, LeDoux, Lynn, Meyer, Nelson, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Roses, Salmon, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Wilson Nays: Samuels Excused: Foster Absent: Kohring And so, CSHB 177(FIN) am passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Samuels moved the effective date clause. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 177(FIN) am--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 38 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Buch, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Doll, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Kelly, Kerttula, LeDoux, Lynn, Meyer, Nelson, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Roses, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Wilson Excused: Foster Absent: Kohring And so, the effective date clause was adopted. 2007-05-11 House Journal Page 1274 CSHB 177(FIN) am was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.